|
Search Strategies for MEDLINE in Ovid Syntax and the PubMed translation
Our Clinical Hedges database contains data for the year 2000 for each article in
each of the issues of 170 clinical journals (journal list). 161 of these journals were indexed in MEDLINE
(journal
list). The MEDLINE search strategies are located on this page. To view the
search strategy for EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO,
please click on the appropriate link. To find out more about the Hedges Project,
click here.
MEDLINE
For each purpose category (therapy, diagnosis, prognosis, reviews, clinical prediction guides, qualitative, causation (etiology), costs, economics),
the following data are shown: the single term with the highest sensitivity while
keeping specificity at ³ 50%; the single
term with the highest specificity while keeping the sensitivity ³ 50%; the single term with the least (minimal) absolute difference between
sensitivity and specificity; and then the same data for multiple terms (the single
term strategy may be shown again if it performs at least as well as multiple terms).
In the second column of the table the search strategies are shown in Ovid syntax
followed by the PubMed translation. In the third column of the table: sens = sensitivity;
spec = specificity; prec = precision; acc = accuracy. References for the methods and individual categories appear at the end of the document. |
Therapy |
Strategy type |
Ovid Strategy |
Sens / spec / prec / acc(%) |
PubMed Translation |
1 term
high sensitivity |
clinical trial.mp,pt.
|
95 / 94 / 35/ 94 |
(clinical[Title/Abstract] AND
trial[Title/Abstract]) OR
clinical trials[MeSH Terms] OR
clinical trial[Publication Type] |
1 term
high specificity |
randomized controlled trial.pt.
|
93 / 98 / 56 / 97 |
| randomized controlled trial[Publication Type] |
1 term
min difference |
randomized controlled trial.pt. |
93 / 98 / 56 / 97 |
| randomized controlled trial[Publication Type] |
2 or more terms
high sensitivity |
clinical trial.mp. OR
clinical trial.pt. OR
random:.mp. OR tu.xs. |
99 / 70 / 10 / 71 |
(clinical[Title/Abstract] AND
trial[Title/Abstract]) OR
clinical trials[MeSH Terms] OR
clinical trial[Publication Type] OR random*[Title/Abstract] OR
random allocation[MeSH Terms] OR
therapeutic use[MeSH Subheading] |
2 or more terms
high specificity |
randomized controlled trial.pt. OR
randomized controlled trial.mp. |
93 / 97 / 54 / 97 |
| randomized controlled trial[Publication Type] OR (randomized[Title/Abstract] AND
controlled[Title/Abstract] AND trial[Title/Abstract]) |
2 or more terms
min difference |
randomized controlled trial.pt. OR
randomized.mp. OR
placebo.mp. |
96 / 95 / 39 / 95 |
randomized controlled trial[Publication Type] OR
randomized[Title/Abstract] OR
placebo[Title/Abstract] |
Diagnosis |
Strategy type |
Ovid Strategy |
Sens / spec / prec / acc(%) |
PubMed Translation |
1 term
high sensitivity |
di.xs.
|
92 / 68 / 1 / 68 |
| diagnosis[Subheading] |
1 term
high specificity |
specificity.tw.
|
65 / 98 / 11 / 98 |
| specificity[Title/Abstract] |
1 term
min difference |
exp "diagnostic techniques and procedures" |
67 / 75 / 1 / 75 |
| "diagnostic techniques and procedures"[MeSH Term] |
2 or more terms
high sensitivity |
sensitiv:.mp. OR diagnos:.mp. OR di.fs. |
99 / 74 / 1 / 74 |
sensitiv*[Title/Abstract] OR
sensitivity and specificity[MeSH Terms] OR
diagnos*[Title/Abstract] OR diagnosis[MeSH:noexp] OR
diagnostic * [MeSH:noexp] OR
diagnosis,differential[MeSH:noexp] OR
diagnosis[Subheading:noexp] |
2 or more terms
high specificity (single term is best performer) |
specificity.tw. |
65 / 98 / 11 / 98 |
| specificity[Title/Abstract] |
2 or more terms
min difference |
sensitiv:.mp. OR
predictive value:.mp. OR
accurac:.tw. |
93 / 92 / 3 / 92 |
sensitiv*[Title/Abstract] OR
sensitivity and specificity[MeSH Terms] OR
(predictive[Title/Abstract] AND value*[Title/Abstract]) OR
predictive value of tests[MeSH Term] OR
accuracy*[Title/Abstract] |
Prognosis |
Strategy type |
Ovid Strategy |
Sens / spec / prec / acc(%) |
PubMed Translation |
1 term
high sensitivity |
exp epidemiologic studies
|
65 / 79 / 1 / 79 |
| epidemiologic studies[MeSH term] |
1 term
high specificity |
exp epidemiologic studies |
65 / 79 / 1 / 79 |
| epidemiologic studies[MeSH term] |
1 term
min difference |
exp epidemiologic studies |
65 / 79 / 1 / 79 |
| epidemiologic studies[MeSH term] |
2 or more terms
high sensitivity |
incidence.sh. OR exp mortality OR
follow-up studies.sh. OR
prognos:.tw. OR
predict:.tw. OR
course:.tw. |
90 / 80 / 2 / 80 |
incidence[MeSH:noexp] OR
mortality[MeSH Terms] OR
follow up studies[MeSH:noexp] OR
prognos*[Text Word] OR
predict*[Text Word] OR
course*[Text Word] |
2 or more terms
high specificity |
prognos:.tw. OR
first episode.tw. OR
cohort.tw. |
52 / 94 / 3 / 94 |
prognos*[Title/Abstract] OR
(first[Title/Abstract] AND
episode[Title/Abstract]) OR
cohort[Title/Abstract] |
2 or more terms
min difference |
prognosis.sh. OR
diagnosed.tw. OR
cohort:.mp. OR
predictor:.tw. OR
death.tw. OR
exp models, statistical |
83 / 84 / 2 / 84 |
prognosis[MeSH:noexp] OR
diagnosed[Title/Abstract] OR
cohort*[Title/Abstract] OR
cohort effect[MeSH Term] OR
cohort studies[MeSH:noexp] OR
predictor*[Title/Abstract] OR
death[Title/Abstract] OR
"models, statistical"[MeSH Term] |
Reviews |
Strategy type |
Ovid Strategy |
Sens / spec / prec / acc(%) |
PubMed Translation |
1 term
high sensitivity |
search:.tw. |
79 / 99 / 52 / 99 |
| search*[Title/Abstract] |
1 term
high specificity |
MEDLINE.tw. |
55 / 99.5 / 62.9 / 99 |
| MEDLINE[Title/Abstract] |
1 term
min difference |
control:.tw. |
72 / 84 / 7 / 84 |
| control*[Title/Abstract] |
2 or more terms
high sensitivity |
search:.tw.OR
meta analysis.mp,pt.OR
review.pt.OR
di.xs. OR
associated.tw. |
99.9 / 52 / 3 / 53 |
search*[Title/Abstract] OR
meta analysis[Publication Type] OR
meta analysis[Title/Abstract] OR
meta analysis[MeSH Terms] OR
review[Publication Type] OR
diagnosis[MeSH Subheading] OR
associated[Title/Abstract] |
2 or more terms
high specificity |
MEDLINE.tw.OR
systematic review.tw.OR
meta analysis.pt. |
71 / 99.2 / 57 / 99 |
MEDLINE[Title/Abstract] OR
(systematic[Title/Abstract] AND
review[Title/Abstract]) OR
meta analysis[Publication Type] |
2 or more terms
min difference |
meta analysis.mp,pt.OR
review.pt.OR
search:.tw. |
98 / 91 / 14 / 91 |
meta analysis[Publication Type] OR
meta analysis[Title/Abstract] OR
meta analysis[MeSH Terms] OR
review[Publication Type] OR
search*[Title/Abstract] |
Clinical Prediction Guides |
Strategy type |
Ovid Strategy |
Sens / spec / prec / acc(%) |
PubMed Translation |
1 term
high sensitivity |
predict:.mp. |
78 / 91 / 2 / 91 |
predict*[Title/Abstract] OR
predictive value of tests[MeSH Term] |
1 term
high specificity |
validat:.tw. |
57 / 99 / 8 / 99 |
| validat*[Title/Abstract] |
1 term
min difference |
predict:.mp. |
78 / 91 / 2 /91 |
predict*[Title/Abstract] OR
predictive value of tests[MeSH Term] |
2 or more terms
high sensitivity |
predict:.mp. OR
scor:.tw. OR
observ:mp. |
96 / 79 / 1 / 79 |
predict*[Title/Abstract] OR
predictive value of tests[MeSH Term] OR
scor*[Title/Abstract] OR
observ*[Title/Abstract] OR
observer variation[MeSH Term] |
2 or more terms
high specificity |
validation.tw. OR
validate.tw. |
54 / 99 / 12 / 99 |
validation[Title/Abstract] OR
validate[Title/Abstract] |
2 or more terms
min difference |
predict:tw. OR
validat:.mp. OR
develop.tw. |
90 / 90 / 2 / 90 |
predict*[Title/Abstract] OR
validat*[Text Word] OR
develop[Title/Abstract] |
Qualitative |
Strategy type |
Ovid Strategy |
Sens / spec / prec / acc(%) |
PubMed Translation |
1 term
high sensitivity |
interview:.mp. |
71 / 97 / 13 / 97 |
interview*[Title/Abstract] OR
interviews[MeSH:noexp] |
1 term
high specificity |
interviews.tw. |
56 / 99 / 26 / 99 |
| interviews[Title/Abstract] |
1 term
min difference |
interview:.mp. |
71 / 97 / 13 / 97 |
interview*[Title/Abstract] OR
interviews[MeSH:noexp] |
2 or more terms
high sensitivity |
interview:.tw. OR
px.fs. OR
exp health services administration |
95 / 70 / 2 / 70 |
interview*[Title/Abstract] OR
psychology[Subheading:noexp] OR
health services administration[MeSH Term] |
2 or more terms
high specificity |
qualitative.tw. OR
themes.tw. |
61 / 99 / 37 / 99 |
qualitative[Title/Abstract] OR
themes[Title/Abstract] |
2 or more terms
min difference |
interview:.mp. OR
experience:.mp. OR
qualitative.tw. |
92 / 92 / 7 / 92 |
interview*[Title/Abstract] OR
interviews[MeSH:noexp] OR
experience*[Text Word] OR
qualitative[Title/Abstract] |
Causation (Etiology) |
Strategy type |
Ovid Strategy |
Sens / spec / prec / acc(%) |
PubMed Translation |
1 term
high sensitivity |
risk:mp. |
78 / 84 / 3 / 83 |
risk*[Title/Abstract] OR
risk*[MeSH:noexp] OR
risk *[MeSH:noexp] |
1 term
high specificity |
risk factor:.mp. |
51 / 91 / 3 / 91 |
risk factor*[Title/Abstract] OR
risk factors[MeSH Term] |
1 term
min difference |
risk:mp. |
78 / 84 / 3 / 83 |
risk*[Title/Abstract] OR
risk*[MeSH:noexp] OR
risk *[MeSH:noexp] |
2 or more terms
high sensitivity |
risk:.mp. OR
exp cohort studies OR
between group:.tw. |
93 / 63 / 2 / 63
|
risk*[Title/Abstract] OR
risk*[MeSH:noexp] OR
risk *[MeSH:noexp] OR
cohort studies[MeSH Terms] OR
group*[Text Word] |
2 or more terms
high specificity |
relative risk:.tw. OR
risks.tw. OR
cohort stud:.mp. |
51 / 95 / 6 / 95 |
(relative[Title/Abstract] AND risk*[Title/Abstract]) OR
(relative risk[Text Word]) OR
risks[Text Word] OR
cohort studies[MeSH:noexp] OR
(cohort[Title/Abstract] AND
stud*[Title/Abstract]) |
2 or more terms
min difference |
risk.mp. OR
mortality.mp. OR
cohort.tw. |
83 / 83 / 3 / 83 |
risk[Title/Abstract] OR
risk[MeSH:noexp] OR
mortality[Title/Abstract] OR
mortality[MeSH:noexp] OR
cohort[Title/Abstract] |
Costs |
Strategy type |
Ovid Strategy |
Sens / spec / prec / acc(%) |
PubMed Translation |
1 term
high sensitivity |
cost:.mp. |
99 / 97 / 16 / 97 |
cost*[Title/Abstract] OR
"costs and cost analysis"[MeSH:noexp] |
1 term
high specificity |
cost effective:.tw. |
50 / 99 / 32 / 99 |
| cost effective*[Title/Abstract] |
1 term
min difference |
ec.fs. |
97 / 97 / 15 / 97 |
| economics[Subheading:noexp] |
2 or more terms
high sensitivity |
ec.fs. OR
cost.tw. OR
health care costs.sh. |
100 / 96 / 13 / 96 |
economics[Subheading:noexp] OR
cost[Title/Abstract] OR
health care costs[MeSH:noexp] |
2 or more terms
high specificity |
cost effectiveness.tw. OR
health care costs.sh. |
57 / 99.5 / 37 / 99 |
cost effectiveness[Title/Abstract] OR
health care costs[MeSH:noexp] |
2 or more terms
min difference |
exp "costs and cost analysis" OR
costs.tw. OR
cost effective:.tw. |
98 / 98 / 18 / 98 |
"costs and cost analysis"[MeSH Term] OR
costs[Title/Abstract] OR
cost effective*[Title/Abstract] |
Economics |
Strategy type |
Ovid Strategy |
Sens / spec / prec / acc(%) |
PubMed Translation |
1 term
high sensitivity |
cost:.tw. |
97 / 97 / 16 / 97 |
| cost*[Title/Abstract] |
1 term
high specificity |
cost effective:.tw. |
66 / 99 / 6 / 99 |
| cost effective*[Title/Abstract] |
1 term
min difference |
cost:.tw. |
97 / 97 / 3 / 97 |
| cost*[Title/Abstract] |
2 or more terms
high sensitivity |
randomized controlled trial.pt. OR
cost effectiveness.tw. OR
cost effective.tw. |
100 / 94 / 1 / 94 |
randomized controlled trial[Publication Type] OR
cost effectiveness[Title/Abstract] OR
cost effective[Title/Abstract] |
2 or more terms
high specificity |
cost effective.tw. OR
sensitivity analys:.tw. |
51 / 99.4 / 6 / 99 |
cost effective[Title/Abstract] OR
sensitivity analys*[Title/Abstract] |
2 or more terms
min difference |
cost:.mp. OR
cost benefit analys:.mp. OR
health care costs.mp. |
97 / 96 / 2 / 96 |
cost*[Title/Abstract] OR
"costs and cost analysis"[MeSH:noexp] OR
cost benefit analys*[Title/Abstract] OR
cost-benefit analysis[MeSH Term] OR
health care costs[MeSH:noexp] |
|
References
Wilczynski
NL, McKibbon KA, Haynes RB. Enhancing retrieval of best evidence for health care
from bibliographic databases: calibration of the hand search of the literature. Medinfo. 2001;10(Pt 1):390-3.
Wong SS, Wilczynski
NL, Haynes RB, Ramkissoonsingh R. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting
sound clinical prediction studies in MEDLINE. Proc AMIA Symp. 2003;:728-32.
Wilczynski NL,
Haynes RB. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound
causation studies in MEDLINE. Proc AMIA Symp. 2003;:719-23.
Haynes RB,
Wilczynski NL. Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong
studies of diagnosis from MEDLINE: analytical survey. BMJ. 2004;328:1040-2.
Wilczynski NL,
Haynes RB; The Hedges Team. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting
clinically sound prognostic studies in MEDLINE. BMC Medicine. 2004;2:23
(5 pages).
Wong
SS, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting
Clinically Relevant Qualitative Studies in MEDLINE. Medinfo. 2004;2004:311-6.
Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB, Lavis JN, Ramkissoonsingh R, Arnold-Oatley A, for the
HSR Hedges Team. Optimal search strategies for detecting health services research
studies in MEDLINE. CMAJ, 2004 Nov 9;171(10)1179-85. There is free full
text for this article at: http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/reprint/171/10/1179.
Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, Haynes RB for the Hedges Team. Optimal search
strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from MEDLINE: an analytical survey. BMJ. 2005 Jan 8;330(7482):68. Epub 2004 Dec 24. There is free full text for this
article at: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/reprint/330/7482/68.
Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Wilczynski NL, WalterSD, Werre SR; Hedges
Team. Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies
of treatment from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ. 2005 May 21;330(7501):1179. Epub 2005 May 13. |
|
|